Features
Tragedy of the new AU headquarters
Chika Ezeanya
2012-01-26, Issue 567
http://pambazuka.org/en/category/features/79400
Printer friendly version
There are 2 comments on this article.
On the 28 January 2012, African countries will collectively descend to a new low on the global index of state sovereignty, territorial integrity and actual independence of nations. On that day, Chinese President Hu Jintao will be in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, to commission the new $124 million African Union headquarters built and donated to the continent by China. Termed ‘China’s gift to Africa’, the edifice was constructed by the China State Construction Engineering Corporation with over 90 percent Chinese labour.
It is to the discredit of the African Union – and therefore to every individual and country within that regional body – that in 2012 a building as symbolic as the African Union headquarters is designed, built and maintained by a foreign country, it does not matter which.
The ancient and modern history of donation of buildings and structures from one nation to another is filled with intrigues and subterfuges, conquests, diplomatic scheming, espionage and counter-espionage, economic manipulations, political statements and dominations. The construction of the Trojan horse by Odysseus and its ‘donation’ resulted in the Greek conquest of the ancient city of Troy after 10 years of unending skirmish.
In building the Basilica in Rome – termed the ‘greatest of all churches of Christendom’, contributions from the faithful were emphasized rather than donations from friendly nations. Even the gift of the Liberty Statue from France to the United States on the occasion of the latter’s independence was a joint effort, whereby over 120,000 Americans led by Joseph Pulitzer contributed funds for the construction of the pedestal in 1885.
In a rare glimpse into the matter, the book ‘Architecture of Diplomacy’, Jane C. Loeffler reveals the underlying diplomatic maneuverings and political ramifications that define the construction of American embassies all over the world. The author states that building an embassy requires ‘as much diplomacy as design.’ Loeffler enumerates factors seriously considered in the construction of an American embassy building and they include ‘world politics, American agendas, architectural politics, cultural considerations, security’ and several others.
Common sense dictates that in an era of increasing exploitation of Africa’s natural resources by foreign powers including China, the African Union, rather than the apparent submission signified by acceptance of the construction of its headquarters by China, should be an organisation advocating for fairness in the relationship that exists between the continent and the global powers.
Should security considerations be included, then the question arises as to how African heads of state and government could hold confidential meetings in a building they have no idea how it was wired. What guarantee do African governments have that every word uttered in the new headquarters in Addis Ababa is not heard in Beijing? What evidence negates the suspicion that all activities in the just completed building are not replayed on a large screen in Beijing as Chinese secret service agents watch?
Culturally, indigenous Bantu culture abhors dependence on others for sustenance. A favorite Swahili proverb of Mwalimu Julius Nyerere’s was ‘Mgeni siku mbili; siku ya tatu mpe jembe’, which means: ‘treat your guest as a guest for two days; on the third day give him a hoe.’ Indigenous African tradition largely abhors dependency of any kind. It is frowned upon for a man not to thatch his rooftops well before the rainy season, or to stay back while others are going to the farm, except when he is bedridden. Add this to the logic espoused in ‘Archtitecture of Diplomacy’ and one reasonably concludes that it is unacceptable for Africans to accept a building from China that will house what should be the landmark of the continent’s achievements and its aspirations for the future.
Clearly, much indiscretion was exercised by African Union officials in accepting the offer of a new headquarters from China. The African Union has since deviated from the ideals of its founding fathers when in the 1960s Kwame Nkrumah and other great African leaders sought to establish an organization that would protect the geographical contiguity and territorial integrity of African nations. Emperor Haile Selassie in his historic 1963 speech stated clearly that the organization was founded because ‘Africa has been reborn as a free continent and Africans have been reborn as free men. The blood that was shed and sufferings that were endured are today Africa’s advocates for freedom and unity.’
Contrary to his predecessor’s commitment to the continued freedom of the continent from imperial forces, Ethiopian President Meles Zenawi – currently accused of selling huge swathes of Ethiopian land to foreign countries – on a tour of the facility boasted of how he single handedly lobbied Chinese officials to build the new headquarters and how he exempted taxes on all Chinese imported construction materials.
Gleeful at the opportunity for African heads of state to indulge in their lifestyles of conspicuous consumption during meetings and summits, AU Projects Director Fantahun Hailemikael reports that among the several luxuries of the building is a ‘helicopter landing pad so visiting dignitaries will be flown from the airport.’ Of course the dignitaries will be spared the sight of the slum that much of Addis Ababa is. They will be flown from the airport to the AU building and from there to Sheraton Addis, reportedly the best of its kind around the world.
While the African Union thinks it has gained from China by moving into its new ultra-modern facility, the reality is that the continent has lost tremendously in all matters worthy of reasonable consideration. The move to reverse the derogatory perception of Africa and Africans by all non-Africans has suffered another major setback. The effect will be the continued political and economic manipulation and domination of the region by the West, and now China, and soon the rest of the non-African world.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY PAMBAZUKA NEWS.
* Chika Ezeanya blogs at ChikaforAfrica.
* Please send comments to editor[at]pambazuka[dot]org or comment online at Pambazuka News.
Readers' Comments
Let your voice be heard. Comment on this article.
I was shocked by your reading the article by Chika Ezeanya who is supposed to be an independent scholar with keen interest in foreign affairs, in particular Sino-African relations. If the author is a serious person, I would like to talk to him/her in a serious and frank way. Otherwise, just like throw my time into the toilet.
Let me say, first of all, you are very narrow-minded and even beyond that. As a scholar trained in China, US and UK, I am amazed by your attitude to foreign aids in view of global village era and practical needs as well. Historically speaking, China befefitted a lot from international help and supports during the different eras. Both Chinese government and scholars discuss the vital help from the US during the WWII, from the former Soviet Union during the formative decade of the 1950s that played the key role in China's reconstruction. We now even remember the valuable help from the former Japanese imperial pilots who helped train the first group of pilots Chinese air force. The same attitude could be found in Americans who remeber the French assistance during the Independence War; the British who appreciated the US armies during the two world wars; and the Europeans who praised the Marshall Plan". Few, if none, people like you so ignorant, blinded, exclusive and mean.
Second, you seem to know nothing of Chinese culture, modern history and basic international law and trade norms. To be ill-informed is OK, no one or government force you to read and write. But to be an irresponbible writer is not good to you and your country and Africa. In many cases, persons who claim patriots often ruin their country's reputation by their selfish behavior. No traitor admits their betrayal of their country; but their deeds mean all. Third, you are welcome to visit China or talk to the scholars, Chinese or non-Chinese, who know China in a real sense. I am not talking about Ian Taylor, a professor at St. Andrew University. As Chinese saying goes, "seeing is believing", you are certainly welcome to visit China. Or find the book by Dambisa Moyo's book on "How the West Was Lost". I hope you are not lost any more in the new century, in which I have full confidence in Africa and its people.
Good luck to all.
Wang Li, PhD Professor at Nankai University
The fear of China being mongered around is unfounded …in a way an insult to the African… made worse when the African buys into it and start spreading it. We are feasting on western media too much without digesting.
China is giving Africa the balancing capital (the bail out) that she needs to come out from the trappings of colonization. Who cares whether the dragon has anterior motives or not for as long as Africa breaks loose and is able to set the agenda? Here, what matters is not who built the building or how much and has been spent. It is about who is going to use the building and how the building is going to be used. Malawi kicked out Taiwan when a better and bigger partner was found, what could stop African governments from doing the same with the Chinese if a better partner is found or when the countries are mature enough to go it alone. –the western media projects Africa as a passive participant in what China is doing. As if all Africa is Somalia … Africans should be careful not to buy into that.
Ndirande Love