Printer-friendly versionSend by emailPDF version
Response to 'Global currency wars and US imperialism'

‘There are two monetary systems fighting for control of the global markets,’ writes Ellen Dunn. ‘One system is controlled by US and western European private banks using debt and the other is managed by sovereign states.’

I read the article by Samir Amin. I am an African American former Treasury analyst that helped the FRB that is now being used against the global community. I advised the FRB and Treasury in 1980 that the risk was to great and legal issues needed to be resolved.

I filed a U.S. lawsuit in 2005 to investigate big banks and a International Criminal Complaint on behalf of African Americans, African states, and Arab states based on a hidden U.S. international ruling "U.S. v. The Libellants and Claimants of the Schooner Amistad, Her Tackle, Apparel, and Furniture, Together with Her Cargo, and the Africans Mentioned and Described in the Several Libels and Claims, 40 U.S. 518(1841)". It is on the Internet. Economists should be looking at the rule of of law first. This one ruling protect Arab and African countries from global domination by U.S. and western Europe private international banks. Samir Amin and other economists should review the legal platform.

There are two monetary systems fighting for control of the global markets. One system is controlled by U.S. and western European private banks using debt and the other is managed by sovereign states. Private banks are luring sovereign states into fighting the wrong battle. Get back on the gold standard, which can only be owned by sovereign states.